Unauthorized snack kiosk blocks the only escape route in Jaina Tower II

A casual glance at the red-canopied kiosk branded “Shyam Kachauri Samosé Wala” (G-11, Jaina Tower-2, District Centre, Janakpuri, New Delhi – 110058; proprietor – Surender Gupta, mob. 96253 80126) might tempt hungry visitors.
Look closer and you’ll see it sits exactly beneath – and partly inside – the emergency staircase/lift shaft redoubt on the ground floor (see photos above). That space is legally required to stay clear at all times for fire-fighting access and safe evacuation. By renting/selling it to a food vendor, the builder has created a perfect storm of life-safety violations.


What makes this set-up illegal?

Code / GuidelineWhat it saysHow the kiosk violates it
National Building Code of India, 2016 – Part 4 (Fire & Life Safety) 4.4.2Exit routes and refuge areas must be “kept free of any obstruction or combustible storage.”The kiosk walls, cooking oil, LPG cylinders, snack packs and wooden stalls are all combustible obstacles.
Delhi Building Bye-Laws, 2016 – 6.4.3 & 6.7.1Staircase and lift cores are non-FAR (non-saleable) service areas; commercial activity is prohibited.The builder has effectively monetised a non-saleable area by leasing it.
Delhi Fire Services Act, 2007 – Section 25Any alteration that compromises means of egress renders the Fire NOC void and attracts penalties.With the staircase blocked, the tower’s Fire NOC renewal is liable to be rejected (and already has been flagged in earlier notices).

Why this puts every occupant at risk

  1. Blocked escape – In a smoke-filled corridor, seconds count. A single kiosk could choke the only protected staircase/lift lobby for eight storeys.
  2. Added fuel load – Fryers, LPG cylinders, cardboard cartons and snack-pack foils dramatically raise the fire load right next to the exit.
  3. Electrical overload – Extension boards visible in the stall tap into the common riser, increasing chances of short-circuits.
  4. Structural stress – Unauthorised drilling to anchor shelves and awnings weakens the granite-clad column that already carries lift loads.
  5. Insurance & legal liability – Policies can be voided if owners/tenants knowingly allow code violations; criminal negligence clauses may apply.

A short timeline of builder non-compliance (highlights)

YearViolation snapshot
1989DDA revoked original sanction for extra FAR and illegal mezzanines.
2010-2024Multiple Fire-NOC renewals issued with “conditions”; complaints show conditions were rarely met.
Apr 2025Anarkali, Chandni Chowk fire tragedy reminds Delhi of the cost of blocked exits – yet this kiosk remains.
Jul 2025Residents file photographic evidence (the images in this post) to DDA & Delhi Fire Service.

(Full chronology on https://jainatowerfacts.com/fire-noc-issues)


What residents & authorities should do now

  1. Serve a 24-hour removal notice under Section 430 of the DMC Act for obstruction of a common passage.
  2. Delhi Fire Service should reinspect and immediately suspend the tower’s NOC until the exit is cleared.
  3. RWA & occupants – lodge an FIR citing IPC Section 336 (endangering life or personal safety).
  4. Insist on a third-party structural & fire audit before any NOC renewal.
  5. Publicise – share these images and facts with neighbours, prospective buyers and the media; silence protects only the violator.

Call to action

If you shop, work or even walk through Jaina Tower II, realise that your lifeline in an emergency is currently a deep-fried snack counter. Demand its removal today – before a minor lapse becomes Delhi’s next headline tragedy.

Scroll to Top